Skip to Main Content

Designing Research Assignments

Teaching Students How to Evaluate Information

The USF Libraries has two asynchronous, badging workshops that focus on helping students evaluate information for their research assignments. The first is It's a TRAAP: Evaluating Sources. This Canvas module offers tips and tools for judging resources. Objectives for the workshop include:

  • Identifying research tools & resources available through the USF Libraries
  • Defining the term “authority” as it pertains to research
  • Identifying at least three indicators of authority when presented with a list of possible criteria
  • Correctly identifying criteria of the TRAAP test & apply the TRAAP test to a set of provided examples

Students can register for the workshop here.

The second workshop similar to the first one listed is Finding, Evaluating & Using Information. Objectives include:

  • Identifying and locating resources and collections for the student's information need
  • Using basic techniques to find relevant information
  • Evaluating information sources to determine relevancy, authority, and accuracy
  • Using search results to identify other sources appropriate for the student's research

Students can register for the workshop here.

Arbitrary Specifications for Resources

Some instructions can be very confusing for students. The following instructions can be problematic.
1) "Don't use the internet," or "Don't use Google."
Because most of our e-books, journals, and streaming videos are delivered through internet browsers, students mistakenly assume that they are not allowed to use the resources found through the library databases or e-journals. Students need to learn that not all items delivered through an Internet browser are considered to be "the internet" and that there are distinctions between Google and more reputable sources like Google Scholar and the library's discovery tool (Quicksearch).

Instead, a less general prohibition against using material found on the internet as well as making it clear that library resources and subscription databases are desirable.  Placing a greater emphasis on evaluating sources (no matter where they are found) to ensure they are credible is recommended.

2) "Don't use Wikipedia." Absent context or instruction, students may just use another internet resource that is potentially even less useful.

Instead explain that relying on Wikipedia for information is not academic research, but providing situations where Wikipedia can be helpful (as a tertiary source) to get students to shift from black/white or good/bad thinking towards a more critical approach.

3) "Use only scholarly or peer-reviewed sources." Novice researchers are often unfamiliar with scholarly materials and do not understand what they are or how they can use them effectively.

Instead discuss with students why they should or should not use particular sources or types of sources related to the assignment. Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of particular sources for answering various research questions. Also consider the importance of context when deciding what types of sources you want students to use. Are students allowed to select topics where more popular sources might be acceptable? How can students be encouraged to use and integrate a varitey of credible sources?