Copyright is a form of intellectual property protection provided by the laws of the United States (title 17, U.S. Code) to the creators of "original works of authorship." Copyright grants creators/authors the ability to control the use of the work upon creation for the life of the author +70 years, and gives to authors certain exclusive rights:
Learn more:
Your ability to use material generated by AI tools in projects, presentations, and publications is affected by a number factors:
Material created by generative AI tools does not currently receive copyright protections in the United States. However, generative AI tools can create 'new' material that infringes on existing copyrights. Using this material in a project, presentation, or publication would have to abide by copyright law.
Some policies, conferences, and publishers require full attribution for images and text that have been generated with AI.
Currently, copyright protection is not granted to works created solely by Artificial Intelligence. The U.S. Copyright Office has issued guidance that explains the requirement for human authorship to be granted copyright protection and provides information to creators working in tandem with AI tools on how to effectively and correctly registered their works.
Projects that incorporate both material generated by AI and material originally created by the author can receive copyright protection. but any components of the work that were created by generative AI are still uncopyrightable.
Generative AI tools can be used to infringe on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights by producing derivatives. Before entering any copyrighted material into a generative AI tool as part of a prompt, permissions may need to be obtained.
Matthew Sag pointed out another way that generative AI tools can be used to infringe on copyright without the direct use of copyrighted material. In what he has dubbed the ‘Snoopy Problem,’ copyrighted works, like fictional characters, can be ‘memorized’ and later generated by AI based on a user prompt. In his 2024 “Response to Lee and Grimmelmann” he explains that “the Snoopy Problem is that the more abstractly a copyrighted work is protected, the more likely it is that a generative AI model will “copy” it.”
Generative AI tools are trained on collections of material gathered from many places. Some AI image and text generation tools have been trained on material scraped from web pages without the consent or knowledge of the web page owners.
Several law suits have been brought against AI image and text generation platforms that have used visual and text content created or owned by others as training material. These law suits claim that the use of artists’ or writers' content, without permissions, to train generative AI is an infringement of copyright. Many of these cases are still ongoing as of July 2025.
Several experts have pointed to previous fair use cases to justify a fair use argument for the use of various training data for AI image generation tools. However, the use of material to train a Large Language Model (LLM) will have a different fair use analysis than the use of a small collection of resources to train a custom agent that uses an existing LLM, or the loading of works into a generative AI tool for analysis. Loading copyright protected material into an existing LLM or generative AI tool may be an infringement of copyright.